SEC EDGAR Filings Visit Knobias.com
Go to the Knobias EDGAR Main Menu Search Filings by COMPANY Search Filings by KEYWORD Search Filings by INDUSTRY See the Most Recent EDGAR Filings Get Real-Time EDGAR Alerts and More!!! Ticker Symbol:
NNRF, INC. 10KSB filed on 04/15/2008 Company Filings

Table of Contents View Header Printer Friendly

Unassociated Document
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission file number
 
NNRF, INC.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

Nevada
 
98-0216309
(State of Incorporation)
 
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
     
1574 Gulf Rd., #242, Point Roberts, WA
 
98281
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 
Issuer’s telephone number ( 604 ) 943 - 0706 
 
Securities Registered Pursuant of Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities Registered Pursuant of Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value

Indicate by check mark of the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405)is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

State the aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. $23,587,107 (based upon $0.66 per share as of April 8, 2008).

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $0.001 par value, 47,973,240 shares outstanding as of April 8, 2008, which includes 669,144 shares held in escrow.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one) Yes o No x



NNRF, Inc.
FORM 10-KSB
December 31, 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
 
Page
PART I
     
       
ITEM 1.
 
Description of Business
1
ITEM 2.
 
Description of Property
10
0ITEM 3.
 
Legal Proceedings
10
ITEM 4.
 
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
11
       
PART II
     
       
ITEM 5.
 
Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small
11
   
Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
ITEM 6.
 
Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
16
ITEM 7.
 
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
F-1
ITEM 8.
 
Changes In and Disagreements With Accounting and Financial Disclosure
25
ITEM 8A(T)
 
Controls and Procedures
25
ITEM 8B.
 
Other Information
26
       
PART III
     
       
ITEM 9.
 
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, Control Persons and Corporate
26
   
Governance; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
 
ITEM 10.
 
Executive Compensation
30
ITEM 11.
 
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
32
ITEM 12.
 
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
33
ITEM 13.
 
Exhibits
34
ITEM 14.
 
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
37
       
SIGNATURES
 
       
EXHIBIT INDEX
 
 

 
PART I
 
Item 1. Description of Business.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT NOTICE:

Certain information included herein contains statements that may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, such as statements relating to plans for product development, product placement, capital spending and financing sources. Such forward-looking information involves important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect anticipated results in the future and, accordingly, such results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made herein. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, relatively limited operating history, history of operating losses, the inability to obtain additional capital, the failure to successfully expand our operations, the legal and regulatory requirements related to our industry and the countries within which we operate, the inability to enter into strategic partnerships with state and private owned entities, the loss of key personnel, adverse economic conditions, adverse currency rate fluctuations, the inability to protect our proprietary information against unauthorized use by third parties, the control of our common stock by our management, the classification of our common stock as “penny stock,” the absence of any right to dividends, the costs associated with the issuance of and the rights granted to additional securities, the unpredictability of the trading of our common stock and the ability of our Board of Directors to issue up to 10,000,000 shares, $0.001 par value, of Class A and Class B preferred stock, collectively.

Historical Summary

Nucon, Inc. was organized on August 25, 2005 under the laws of the State of Nevada. On May 23, 2006, Stafford Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Stafford”), acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Nucon, Inc., a Nevada corporation, in exchange for 22,500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to that certain merger and share exchange agreement (“Merger Agreement”). At the closing, Stafford amended its articles of incorporation and changed its name to Nucon-RF, Inc. (“Nucon”), and its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Abucco Technologies, Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Abucco”), and Stafford Energy Canada, Ltd., a Canadian corporation (“Stafford Canada”), became wholly owned subsidiaries of Nucon. Nucon, Inc., a Nevada corporation, remains a wholly owned subsidiary of Nucon. On July 19, 2007, we amended our articles of incorporation to change our name to “NNRF, Inc.”.

As the shares of Stafford common stock issued to Nucon shareholders in the merger transaction represented a controlling interest, the transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization, or reverse merger, with Nucon being considered the acquirer. The recapitalization has been accounted for at historical cost.

Abucco Technologies Inc. and Stafford Energy Canada, Ltd have been inactive since December 31, 2006. The Company intends to divest itself of, or dissolve, both subsidiaries in 2008.

In addition to the two foregoing subsidiaries, the Company incorporated OOO Nucon-RUS (“Nucon-RUS”), a limited liability company formed under the laws of the Russian Federation (“RF”) in 2007. Nucon-RUS is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nucon. In January 2007, Nucon became fully accredited to do business in the RF by the Russian Ministry of Justice.

1

 

NNRF provides technologies, either owned or licensed, that are intended for use in nuclear facilities, nuclear and hazardous waste management, and the public health sector.

NNRF has made investments in, and anticipates making further investments in, strategic businesses that either operate or intend to operate in the nuclear, automotive and aviation industries in Russia. In addition, the Company has, and will continue to, either develop and market, or license and market, internationally, technologies related to the nuclear industry.   NNRF has invested in companies currently operating in the nuclear and automotive industries in Russia and has entered into a joint venture with a Russian company, the Engineering Center for Nuclear Containers, to design and develop containers for transportation and long term storage of high level radioactive waste. Further, the Company presently has technologies that it has either licensed or acquired in the areas of nuclear safety and remediation, wastewater treatment, and power quality. NNRF has, and will continue to, market and either distribute to resellers or sell the products and services related to the foregoing technologies in various international markets. During 2007, NNRF concentrated its international marketing efforts in Europe. NNRF has offices in Moscow, Russia and Munich, Germany.

NNRF’s has relationships, through its investment in ATOLL (defined below with which it participates in management decisions), with Rosenergoatom, the operating utility of Russia’s nuclear civil facilities; and has direct relationships with Atomstroyexport, established by the Russian government to promote the export of Russian construction, operation and modernization of nuclear power plants abroad; the International Center for Environmental Sciences of the Federal Agency of Nuclear Energy (“ICES”), an agency that is focused on nuclear waste decontamination matters in Russia; the Russian based Engineering Center for Nuclear Containers; and Stroikomplektinvest, a construction supply distributor serving as NNRF’s marketing partner for power quality equipment in the Republic of Tatarstan.
 
NNRF began its operations in November 2005 and has accomplished the initial stages of its business strategy. With several key strategic alliances established as noted above, NNRF has the present capability of providing product, technological and technical service support addressing radioactive waste, wastewater and power quality challenges, and energy efficiency, shielding, transport and storage requirements, and plant equipment protection. NNRF also has in-house expertise in radiological protection and radiological waste management. In addition, with NNRF’s acquisition of 50% of ZAO Electro Machinery Building Plant ATOLL (“ATOLL”), NNRF, via ATOLL, is manufacturing and supplying parts and equipment for new and existing nuclear facilities in the RF. In accordance with Russian law, 26% of the shares of ATOLL are held and managed by Nucon-RUS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NNRF. The remaining 24% of the shares are held by NNRF.

NNRF owns, has licensed, or distributes the following technologies:
 
1.  FEECOM/BIECOM - is a non-toxic polymer-based shielding material that can be molded as needed into various forms, including bricks and plates, containers or plaster on fixed walls. This material which encapsulates and shields nuclear radiation could replace the toxic lead walls currently used in nuclear reactors and x-ray rooms around the world. NNRF previously acquired the FEECOM/BIECOM technology from Dr. Hans-Jürgen Engelmann in consideration for options to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock, exercisable for a period of ten (10) years at $0.75 per share. In addition, Dr. Engelmann will receive a royalty equal to 2.5% of the gross revenues relating to the sale of FEECOM/BIECOM to third parties. A patent application has been filed with the European Patent Office for this technology.
 
2

 
2. Bicoflex - is a flexible mixture of silicone and bismuth powder material that provides radiation shielding. The product can be manufactured in various forms including aprons, mats, curtains and garments. Bicoflex is produced by NNRF in Hannover, Germany and has been fully tested and proven to effectively block radiation. Quality assurance is tested by the Fachhoschule Hannover University of Applied Sciences in its special department for radioecology and nuclear safety.

3. Radseal - Manufactured in Germany, this radioactive two-part geopolymer has been fully tested by a European-based nuclear research center and has been cleared by the customs department in Russia for importation into Russia. NNRF plans to offer Radseal for use as dust suppression in contaminated areas in former nuclear facilities in the RF and other international markets.

4.  Trumem - NNRF has entered into a Cooperation Agreement with ASPECT, a Russian research, production and marketing entity engaged in the development, introduction and transfer of innovative high-tech technologies and projects, to jointly engage in the implementation and commercialization of complex technologies and equipment of a gradient-porous metal-ceramic membrane known as Trumem. Trumem is a high-output, long-lasting, inexpensive and compact purification unit for all types of liquid wastes, including radioactive wastes. The principal application of Trumem will involve the rehabilitation of water basins which have become contaminated with liquid radioactive wastes. NNRF’s Chief Scientific Officer, Dr. Valery Lebedev, co-invented Trumem. This technology may provide the basis for a technological breakthrough in solving the current problems of radioactive liquid wastes. Trumem is patent protected in Russia and the European Union.
 
To accomplish its objectives, NNRF’s strategy consists of the following:
 
 
·
Maintain and establish further key alliances with government funding agencies and other international groups responsible for nuclear waste remediation;

 
·
Enter into strategic relationships and acquire an interest in companies which supply products and services to agencies responsible for nuclear markets; and

 
·
Identify, develop and acquire innovative, proprietary technologies which have international environmental and economic applications.

Acquisition of 50% of ATOLL

In March 2007, NNRF completed the acquisition of 50% of the issued and outstanding stock of ATOLL, a private joint stock Russian company. NNRF owns 24% of ATOLL and Nucon-RUS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NNRF, owns 26% of ATOLL. In November 2007, two members of NNRF management were appointed to the board of directors of ATOLL. Additionally, the Director of Strategic Development of ATOLL, has taken a management position with NNRF assisting in overseeing operations in Russia.

ATOLL’s headquarters are located in Moscow, Russia, and its production facilities are located in St. Petersburg, Moscow, and near the city of Kirov, Russia. ATOLL is a manufacturer and supplier of spare parts for existing nuclear power plants, products for the modernization of nuclear power plants. and equipment for facilities currently under construction, among other things.
 
3

 
The original terms of the acquisition agreement with ATOLL provided that NNRF pay $4,290,000 to ATOLL and issue ATOLL 2,000,000 shares of NNRF common stock. The original agreement was subsequently modified to reflect the following: (i) two closings, the first of which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2006 when NNRF paid $1,166,250 in consideration for 13.25% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of ATOLL, and the second of which occurred in March 2007 and consisted of NNRF acquiring an additional 36.75% of ATOLL for $1,000,000 and the issuance of 4,000,000 shares of common stock; and (ii) certain real estate interests of ATOLL were spun-out of ATOLL for the benefit of ATOLL stockholders, not including NNRF. As a result, NNRF has no real estate holdings, either on its own or through its 50% ownership in ATOLL. In the future, NNRF will provide ATOLL the sum of $2,000,000 for the purchase of new equipment to meet expected increases in demand for ATOLL products.

The primary purchaser of equipment for nuclear power plants in Russia is Rosenergoatom, with whom ATOLL has an established relationship to provide technologies, services and equipment as discussed below.

During the third and fourth quarter of 2007, ATOLL moved a portion of its production facilities from St. Petersburg into a facility owned by Velcont located in the Kirov region of Russia. This relocation is intended to improve production efficiencies and reduce overall production costs. The Kirov region is more closely located to customers and material suppliers than St. Petersburg, Russia.

The business model of ATOLL is to supply spare parts for existing nuclear power plants, supply products for the modernization of nuclear power plants, supply equipment for facilities currently under construction, and supply its storage container products to the Federal dry storage facility currently under construction in Zelesnogorsk, Krasnoyarsk region in Siberia. The Chief Scientific Officer of NNRF, Professor Dr. Valery Lebedev, from 1989-1999 was the General Director of the Mining Chemical Combine in Zelesnogorsk, in which the dry storage facility will become a separate business unit, served as the Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Atomic Energy (1999-2002), and formerly served as an advisor to the Minister of Atomic Energy of the RF.

The ATOLL manufacturing process utilizes advanced computer numerically controlled (“CNC”) machinery. The products manufactured at the ATOLL facility include spare parts for the entire nuclear cycle, including spare parts and mechanisms for nuclear power plants, and handling equipment for nuclear waste containers designed for long term storage of radioactive wastes and spent fuel. The foregoing manufacturing capabilities have applicability in the foreign markets of China and India, among other countries utilizing Russian designed nuclear reactors.

ATOLL has approximately 120 employees consisting of engineers, nuclear industry specialists, technical experts in nuclear equipment design and construction, and skilled manufacturing operators of CNC based machinery. The technical level of the ATOLL employee base has established ATOLL as a designated supplier to facilities operated by Rosenergoatom, the operator of all 31 nuclear reactors in the RF.

ATOLL has its own construction design division and develops all of its own drawings and technical specifications for the manufacturing cycle. ATOLL has established its production as the technical standard for spare parts and mechanisms for the WWER-440 and WWER-1000 nuclear reactors presently in operation and under construction in both the RF and certain foreign markets. The drawings and technical specifications for the spare parts and mechanisms of the foregoing nuclear reactors are the proprietary intellectual property of ATOLL.
 
4

 
ATOLL has existing and prior foreign trade contracts with operators of nuclear power plants outside of the RF (e.g., Ukraine and Bulgaria), and exports spare parts for WWER-440 and WWER-1000 nuclear reactors to each of these countries. ATOLL also has technical support and production capacity to support sales to other export markets. NNRF believes that marketing opportunities exist which may result in increases in sales to these foreign markets and other markets. The WWER-440 and WWER-1000 nuclear reactors are the latest designs from Russia.

The WWER-440 and WWER-1000 nuclear reactors, similar to all reactors worldwide, require continuous replacement of their operating parts due to strict safety standards established by the nuclear industry. Government mandated requirements establish consistent and long term contracts for the production output of ATOLL in the RF, existing foreign markets and, potentially, future markets such as China and India. ATOLL currently has booked advance sales through the year 2010.

NNRF believes the ATOLL acquisition offers opportunities for cash dividends and opens up future market opportunities for the technical innovations, acquired and licensed technologies, and further acquisitions currently in the due diligence phase or under investigation by NNRF There can be no assurance that ATOLL will operate profitably.
 
Acquisition of 25.5% of JSC Electroprivod and Velcont

NNRF has executed agreements and has commenced the acquisition of 25.5% of JSC Electroprivod and 25.5% of Velcont for the collective sum of $8,000,000. Each of the acquisitions will be made together with management of ATOLL, who will purchase an equal share of JSC Electroprivod and Velcont, and collectively the parties will own 51% of each entity upon the closing. To date, NNRF has acquired 3.3% of Velcont in consideration for $525,000.

Velcont is located in the city of Kirov-Chepetsk, Russia, and JSC Electroprivod is located in the city of Kirov, Russia. JSC Electroprivod intends to relocate certain aspects of its manufacturing to the Velcont facility. This relocation is intended to result in higher levels of efficiency and may result in substantial cost savings.

Velcont is fully licensed by the Federal Ministry of Atomic Energy of the Russian Federation (“Minatom”) for the production of nuclear power plant equipment and holds other licenses for the production of equipment and microelectronics for the aeronautical and automotive industries. Presently, Velcont has approximately 500,000 square feet of production facilities and employs approximately 1,200 skilled workers.

JSC Electroprivod is a scientific and technical complex and a leading designer of micro-electronic equipment in the RF and is licensed by the Federal Ministry of Nuclear Energy of the RF and other federal ministries. Over the last 50 years, JSC Electroprivod has designed and developed over 1,500 products used in the Russian and the CIS aeronautical and automotive industries. More than 200 of these items are currently being manufactured at factories in the cities of Kirov, Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kizlyar, Kursk, Saratov and Tyumen.
  
Alliances and Strategic Partnerships

In addition to the ATOLL 50% acquisition, and the ongoing acquisition of interests in JSC Electroprivod and Velcont, since its inception, NNRF has focused on procuring key strategic partnerships and alliances principally in the RF and acquiring or licensing key technologies. A description of the current alliances and strategic partnerships of NNRF follows.

5

 
Rosenergoatom

NNRF has a working relationship with Rosenergoatom to co-lead an international consortium (“Consortium”) of European and Russian companies to provide equipment, technologies and services to Rosenergoatom. This working relationship is anticipated to be evidenced by a definitive agreement in the future upon further advancements of the Russian state entity, Atomprom, which controls all energy generating nuclear facilities in Russia.

Rosenergoatom is the operating utility of all nuclear power plants in the RF and is responsible for insuring nuclear and radiation safety in all phases of nuclear power plant operations in compliance with RF legislation as well as providing scientific and technical support. Rosenergoatom operates all ten (10) state-owned RF nuclear power plants consisting of 31 reactor units representing approximately 23,242-MW of installed electrical capacity. The foregoing represents approximately 18% of the RF power grid.

Increasing demands on technical safety regulations and radiation protection standards at the Russian nuclear energy facilities has caused ever increasing demands on equipment, plants and technologies for the construction, modernization and operation of the facilities operated by Rosenergoatom.

Atomstroyexport

Atomstroyexport (“ASE”) was established in 1998 by the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Atomic Energy in order to promote the export of Russian-made products for nuclear power projects abroad. ASE was created upon the merger of "Atomenergoexport" and "Zarubezhatomenergostroy." In the 25 years prior to the merger, the two Russian companies worked with foreign countries in the construction, operation and modernization of nuclear power plants.

ASE possesses the experience and engineering capabilities to operate in the global market. The nuclear power plants built for its customers in the former Soviet Union (“FSU”), China, India and other countries constitute a future market for NNRF technologies and services. The latest projects of ASE include construction of two nuclear power units (2000 MW total) in China, two nuclear power units of similar capacity in India, as well as other activities in Eastern Europe. There can be no assurance that NNRF and ASE will enter into a joint cooperation agreement for the Indian, and East European markets.

Engineering Center for Nuclear Containers (ECNC)

ECNC is a Moscow and St. Petersburg based company that designs and manufactures containers for the long term storage of nuclear and other types of waste. ECNC has worked with Minatom and provides waste storage containers fully licensed for the storage of radioactive and toxic waste.

International Center for Environmental Sciences (ICES)

ICES is located in Moscow and is a Russian State agency dealing with ecological security and environmental matters related to the handling (including transportation and storage) of radioactive and toxic waste in Russia. ICES is also actively involved in environmental issues concerning the dismantling of Russian nuclear powered submarines.

6

 
TPA, Ltd.

During 2007, TPA became a department of Atomenergomash a Russian state entity. As a result of the restructuring of TPA, the relationship between the Company and TPA was terminated.
 
Products and Technologies
 
FEECOM/BIECOM

FEECOM/BIECOM is a polymer with a metal blocker additive which NNRF believes provides new methods in providing radiation safety. A distinctive feature of this new material is that it is possible to modify its protection and construction properties in different ways based upon the demands of each application. The shielding material also surpasses steel in withstanding corrosion attacks and can be modified with the same structural integrity as steel to be used as a construction material. The shielding materials are not toxic, can be manufactured in an environmentally friendly manner, and have excellent thermal stability.

The moldable nature of the new shielding material provides a significant number of applications for many general shielding devices. Variations in mould configurations for the product include bricks and plates, containers and plaster on fixed walls.

On March 1, 2007, NNRF retained Fachhochschule Hannover (a German testing facility) to undertake the following independent tests on FEECOM/BIECOM: tensile tests; pressure tests; notched-bar impact-binding-tests; 240 hour salt spray tests as corrosion tests; determination of flash point; determination of combustibility; resistance to leaching in weak acid, in weak alkalis, and in normal tap water; sorption ability; and gas diffusion hydrogen. The purpose of the foregoing tests is to provide further independent determination of the efficacy and multi-uses of FEECOM/BIECOM.
 
NNRF is establishing a sale and marketing office in Lower Saxony (Germany). On May 1, 2007, NNRF retained Klaus Rose to serve as the sales and marketing manager of the Company’s shielding, decommissioning and recycling technology portfolio (i.e., FEECOM/BIECOM) to nuclear facilities and multi-national nuclear service companies. Mr. Rose has extensive experience in the nuclear shielding materials field. Mr. Rose’s consulting firm, RCE Rose Consulting & Engineering (“RCE”), has provided various on-site radiological shielding solutions, including dosimetry services, as well as nuclear power plant safety training programs to nuclear utility companies in the European Union. These companies include British Nuclear Fuel Corporation, Risley, U.K., Siemens KWU, Erlangen, ENSA, Santander, Spain and others. Prior to founding RCE, Mr. Rose held advanced positions at several European companies manufacturing products for use in nuclear power plants. Mr. Rose served in the capacities of project engineer, radiation protection officer, and marketing and sales manager while working at NOELL GmbH, NUKEM Group and VOEST ALPINE mce.

Dr. Engelmann, who serves as our Director of Project and Sales Division - Shielding and Encapsulation EU, will provide technical assistance to Mr. Rose. The goal for this marketing office in Western Europe is the development of new modifications of the shielding material, with a particular focus on applications targeted for German governmental funding from the State of Lower Saxony for further research and development, and manufacturing anticipated to be established in Lower Saxony, Germany.

7


Bicoflex

Bicoflex, formulated by NNRF, is a flexible mixture of silicone and bismuth powder material that provides radiation shielding. The product can be manufactured in various forms including aprons, mats, curtains and garments. Bicoflex is manufactured in Germany and has been fully tested and proven to effectively block radiation. In addition, in curtain form, the product can be used in geometrically challenging situations where FEECOM/BIECOM cannot be effectively used as a radiation blocker.

Radseal

Radseal is a radioactive two-part geopolymer that can be used for the containment and encapsulation of radioactive dust, radioactive sludge, broken fuel assembly elements and highly radioactive fuel pieces, and for general containment on radioactive floors and walls. Such containment, once complete, increases the safety for construction personnel to perform decontamination services. NNRF anticipates delivering an initial shipment of Radseal to Russia during 2008 for field and demonstration testing in cooperation with ICES.

Radioactive Waste Containers

NNRF has entered into a joint venture agreement with Moscow-based Engineering Center for Nuclear Containers (“ECNC”) to design, develop and market containers which will hold high level radioactive waste generated by nuclear power plants and other radioactive waste producing operations. This joint venture is planned to be named the Nuclear Container Corporation (“NCC”). NNRF will own 50% of NCC. The goal at the conclusion of the design and development process will be the certification of the containers by the Russian Federal Service on Environmental, Technology and Nuclear Control Rostechnadzor for use in the RF and internationally. This certification will be conducted under the aegis of the International Atomic Energy Agency (“IAEA”). ECNC currently supplies containers in Russia which are designed for other radioactive waste.
 
ASPECT

In April 2007, Nucon entered into an agreement with ASPECT, a Russian research, production and marketing center that develops, introduces and transfers innovative high-tech technologies and projects. ASPECT is the official managing company in the development of international and Russian environmental projects for the Federal Ministry of Nuclear Energy of the Russian Federation and Rosenergoatom, the operator of all Russian nuclear reactors, and includes the participation of all companies in the nuclear industry within the RF. ASPECT has decades of experience as a contractor in improving systems for the handling of radioactive waste and recycling at sites of the Federal Ministry of Nuclear Energy.

The agreement between ASPECT and NNRF is to engage in joint efforts to incorporate complex technologies and equipment in the form of a gradient-porous metal-ceramic membrane known as Trumem. NNRF will be responsible for establishing global strategic alliances to introduce and market the Trumem technology internationally.  

EP Waveform Correction Absorber

The EP Waveform Correction Absorber is a high quality transient voltage surge suppression (“TVSS”) and high frequency noise filtering modular technology that is manufactured in the United States. The TVSS technology filters damaging power pollution being used by electrical equipment, thereby lowering operating costs and downtime and increasing productivity.

8

 
Poor power quality involves pollution on electrical lines resulting from high frequency induced electrical noise, switching transients, and nonlinear and unbalanced load reflections. Power surges, both voltage and current, are occurring continually in today’s power systems. Power surges may occur naturally, such as from lighting and static electricity, or are manmade, such as inductive surges from motors, transformers, solenoids, etc. This poor power quality can reduce operating efficiency and create excess heat that displaces normal power distribution and output. This in turn causes electrical systems and equipment to deteriorate and to malfunction, and is critical in microprocessor based manufacturing industries.

NNRF intends to market this product in Russia to users of expensive electrical equipment such as high output office printers, CT scanners, robots, offices with multiple computer installations and other users where power surges cause significant damage or pose significant danger to operations.

Fire Resistant Cable - Fireproof Swelling Cable Cover

Fire resistant cable and fireproof swelling cable cover technology is for use in nuclear and fossil fuel power plants and other high-impact utility industry applications. When exposed to fire and/or extreme heat, the cable expands and blocks off all connections through the chases where the cables go from room to room. The technology allows the electrical cable to withstand temperatures up to 1100 Celsius for 45 minutes and prevents the spread of fire which is critical in all power generation facilities. The fireproof swelling cable cover is non-toxic with high adhesive properties and has been approved for use by the fire authorities in Russia and is fully licensed. The proven technology has immediate applications in the nuclear power plants of Rosenergoatom and Atomstroyexport and other facilities in the RF.

NNRF has concluded negotiations to acquire this technology subject to completion of due diligence by NNRF which is expected to be completed in the last half of 2008. Representatives from Nucon-RUS will be meeting with management of Seversk (formerly known as Tomsk-7), Ministry of the Russian Federation for Atomic Energy, Russian Research Institute of Organic Materials, Bochvar Institute to finalize the terms of the agreement.
 
Tri-Ion - Wasser Technik 

On December 12, 2005, NNRF entered into an agreement with the German company, Tri-Ion -Wasser Technik (“Tri-Ion”) to represent it in the RF. Tri-Ion specializes in cleaning water which contains heavy metals and other isotopes, and is licensed to operate in the food industry. The Russian industrial partner for hardware and pumps is Hydromshservice. NNRF intends to market Tri-Ion’s technologies and engineering services within the Russian and Ukrainian Vodokanals.

Tri-Ion specializes in cleaning water which contains heavy metals and other isotopes. It is licensed and permitted to work in the food industry. NNRF will receive approximately 15% of the revenues in consideration for these services. Tri-Ion is currently providing water cleaning services in Europe and South America.
 
9

 
COMPETITION

NNRF’s technologies may be subject to significantly greater competition from other companies, many of which have far greater intellectual, financial, marketing and other resources than NNRF. Other technologies may be developed that are superior or less expensive than those owned or licensed by NNRF. Alliances and partnerships may be subject to change.

GOVERNMENT APPROVAL AND GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS

The Company is required to comply with the following environmental regulations, presently consisting of (i) the Federal Nuclear and Radiation Safety Authority of the Russian Federation with respect to the Russian Federation, (ii) the EURATOM Treaty with respect to all European Union member countries, and (iii) the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulations Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations with respect to U.S. matters, the latter of which will apply only upon the placement of the Company’s products in the U.S., which is not applicable at this time. Each of the foregoing regulations generally requires testing and certification of the Company’s products by an independent third party prior to placement in nuclear or other facilities. In the event our products are not tested on a timely basis, or we experience a delay in receiving, or fail to receive, the necessary certifications, government approvals, permits, consents and clearances, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that we will receive each of the foregoing on a timely basis.

At the present time, no further governmental approvals are required for the operation of our business. From time to time we do expect that we will have to obtain custom and other clearances to offer certain of our products and services in countries that we have not previously operated within.
 
COSTS AND EFFECTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS

The costs and effects of compliance with environmental laws are not anticipated to prevent the Company from achieving its business objectives nor have a materially adverse effect on its results of operations.

EMPLOYEES


Item 2.  Description of Property.

We lease approximately 800 square feet of office space in Moscow, Russia, located at 117393Moscow, 20 Architect Vlassov’s st. The monthly lease rate is approximately $6,000 and the lease has a term of 12-months, expiring on March 1, 2009.

We lease executive office space in Munich, Germany, located at Theresienstrasse 6-8,80333 Munich, Germany. The lease is month-month and has a lease rate of approximately $3,000 per month.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, formal inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of the Company, or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting the Company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries, or our officers or directors in their capacities with each, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

10

 
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

No matter was submitted to a vote of the security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Common Equity Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our common stock is currently quoted on the Pink Sheets Electronic Interdealer Quotation and Trading System under the symbol “NNRI.PK.” 
 
For the periods indicated, commencing with the date on which NNRF merged with Stafford Energy, Inc., May 23, 2006, and concluding on April 8, 2008, the following table sets forth the high and low bid prices per share of common stock, as reported by www.pinksheets.com. These prices represent inter-dealer quotations without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
 
Periods
 
High
 
Low
 
Fiscal Year 2006
         
Second Quarter (May 23-June 2006)
   
2.20
   
1.01
 
Third Quarter (July-September 2006)
   
1.42
   
0.70
 
Fourth Quarter (October-December 2006)
   
1.01
   
0.60
 
 
         
Fiscal Year 2007
         
First Quarter (January-March 2007)
   
1.79
   
0.55
 
Second Quarter (April-June 2007)
   
8.96
   
1.74
 
Third Quarter (July 1 - September 30, 2007)
   
5.35
   
1.94
 
Fourth Quarter (October 1 - December 31, 2007)
   
2.74
   
1.12
 
               
Fiscal Year 2008
             
First Quarter (January 1 - March 31, 2008)
   
1.10
   
0.44
 
Second Quarter (April 1 - April 8, 2008)
   
0.66
   
0.42
 

On April 8, 2008, the closing price of our common stock was $0.66.
 
11

 
Holders of Record

As of April 8, 2008, we had approximately 268 holders of record of our common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies.

Dividends

There are no restrictions imposed on the Company which limit its ability to declare or pay dividends on its common stock, except for corporate state law limitations. No cash dividends have been declared or paid to date and none are expected to be paid in the foreseeable future.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

In May 2006, Stafford Energy, Inc. issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock to two individuals in consideration for the settlement of $3,000 owed to the individuals for mergers and acquisitions services provided to Stafford prior to the merger between it and the Company. The shares were valued at $1.05 per share, which was the fair value of the shares on the date of issuance and resulted in the recognition of $3,147,000 of compensation expense. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each offeree was provided access to the financial statements and any other information that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to accept shares of common stock in exchange for the monies owed to them by them by the Company. Each offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks of the foregoing decision.

On May 23, 2006, the Company issued 22,500,000 shares of common stock to forty-nine (49) individuals in exchange for 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Nucon, Inc., a Nevada corporation, in conjunction with the Merger and Plan of Share Exchange between Stafford Energy, Inc. and Nucon, Inc. The 22,500,000 shares of common stock were valued at $5,000, or $0.00022 per share. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each offeree was provided access to the financial statements and any other information of Stafford Energy, Inc. that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to accept shares of common stock in exchange for their shares of common stock of Nucon, Inc. Each offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks associated with the share exchange.

On June 1, 2006, the Company issued a total of 1,080,000 shares of common stock to five (5) consultants for services consisting of legal, accounting, marketing, strategic and financial consulting. The 1,080,000 shares of common stock were valued at $1,512,000, or $1.40 per share. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each offeree was provided access to the Company’s financial statements and any other information that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to accept shares of common stock in exchange for services. Each offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks of the foregoing decision.

During the period from inception through June 30, 2006, the Company received $342,128 in loans from ten (10) individuals. The loans were non-interest bearing and were payable on demand. On July 1, 2006, the lenders made demand on the Company, and the Company agreed to the conversion of $342,128 of outstanding principal into 4,593,073 shares of common stock, conversion of $0.07 per share. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each offeree was provided access to the Company’s financial statements and any other information that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to accept shares of common stock in exchange for their outstanding loans. Each offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks of exchanging their outstanding notes for shares of common stock in the Company.

12

 
On July 1, 2006, the Company sold 185,000 shares of common stock to ten (10) third parties in consideration for $138,750, or $0.75 per share. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each offeree was provided access to the Company’s financial statements and any other information that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to purchase shares of common stock of the Company. Each offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks of their investment in the Company.

On September 10, 2006, the Company issued 400,000 common shares to a consultant for public relation services rendered to the Company. The 400,000 shares of common stock were valued at $556,000, or $1.39 per share. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The offeree was provided access to the Company’s financial statements and any other information that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to accept shares of common stock in exchange for services. The offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks of the foregoing decision.

During the period October 2006 through March 2007, the Company sold 274,167 shares of common stock to twenty-three (23) third parties in consideration for $205,755, or $0.75 per share. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each offeree was provided access to the Company’s financial statements and any other information that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to purchase shares of common stock of the Company. Each offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks of their investment in the Company.

In December 2006, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for investor relations and merger and acquisition consulting services. The 750,000 shares of common stock were valued at $562,500, or $0.75 per share. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The offeree was provided access to the Company’s financial statements and any other information that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to accept shares of common stock in exchange for services. The offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks of the foregoing decision.

In December 2006, the Company issued a total of 432,000 shares of common stock to seven (7) individuals, consisting of members of management and certain key consultants, as partial payment for services rendered in 2006. The 432,000 shares were valued at $324,000, or $0.75 per share. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each offeree was provided access to the Company’s financial statements and any other information that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to accept shares of common stock in exchange for services. Each offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks of the foregoing decision.

13

 
On February 16, 2007, the Company issued the sum of 50,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for marketing and investor relations consulting services. The 50,000 shares were valued at $39,500, or $0.79 per share. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The offeree was provided access to the Company’s financial statements and any other information that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to accept shares of common stock in exchange for services. The offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks of the foregoing decision.

During the period commencing in late July 2006 and concluding in March 2007, the Company issued 8% convertible promissory notes (“Notes”) in the collective original principal amount of $4,700,000 to seventy-four (74) third parties. The Notes have a term of two (2) years and bear simple interest at the rate of 8% per annum, payable at maturity. The Notes were convertible as follows (i) at seventy-five ($0.75) cents per share at any time prior to the Company’s common stock being quoted on the OTCBB; (ii) for a period of ninety (90) days from the date the Company’s common stock is quoted on the OTCBB, at the lesser of a 25% discount to the closing price on the business day preceding the date of conversion or One ($1.00) Dollar with a floor of seventy-five ($0.75) cents; or (iii) thereafter, at the greater of a 25% discount to the closing price on the business day preceding the date of conversion or seventy-five ($0.75) cents. In addition, as of February 9, 2007, the Company has issued warrants to purchase 2,350,000 shares of common stock, exercisable for a period of two (2) years at $1.50 per share (“Warrants”). The Notes and Warrants have been placed by Mercer Capital Ltd. (“Mercer”) on a best efforts basis. Mercer receives (i) a commission of ten (10%) percent and a non-accountable expense allowance of three (3%) percent on all Notes sold, and (ii) a warrant to purchase shares of common stock equal to ten (10%) percent of the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes (“Mercer Warrants”). The Mercer Warrants are exercisable on a cashless basis at the rate of $0.75 per share for a period of five (5) years. The Mercer Warrants consist of the right to purchase 861,667 shares on the above terms. In addition, Mercer was issued, in consideration for serving as the placement agent, warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share, on a cashless basis, for a period of five (5) years. The issuance of the above securities was effected in reliance on the exemptions for sales of securities not involving a public offering, as set forth in Section 4(2) of the Act and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each offeree was provided access to the Company’s financial statements and any other information that they deemed relevant or necessary in making their respective decision to purchase the Notes. Each offeree was deemed to have the financial or business experience necessary to evaluate the risks of their investment in the Company.

On May 17, 2007, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a Business Advisory Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”). The Advisory Agreement provides that the third party will render financial and business advisory consulting advice, among other services. The 250,000 shares were valued at $1,362,500, or $5.45 per share.

On June 18, 2007, 8% convertible notes, in the original principal amount of $4,700,000 and accrued interest of $196,539, were converted into 6,528,719 shares of common stock, a conversion rate of $0.75 per share. On the date of conversion, the closing market price of the Company’s common stock was $5.35. Since the accrued interest was converted at a rate lower that the fair value, the Company recorded the per share difference of $4.60 (totaling $1,205,440) as additional expense.

14

 
On June 19, 2007, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to a third party to serve as an advisor on the foreign capital markets (i.e., the Middle East and Europe), waste management services and potential contracts in the Middle East and Europe, as well as strategic alliances. The 50,000 shares were valued at $257,500, or $5.15 per share.

On August 27, 2007, the Company entered into a revolving credit facility agreement (“Credit Facility”) in the amount of $2,500,000, with Professional Offshore Opportunity Fund, Ltd.  (the “Lender”).  Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company may borrow up to $2,500,000 from Lender, with $500,000 advanced on closing and additional amounts to be advanced in increments not to exceed $250,000, or more if the parties agree, in any thirty-day period, unless waived by Lender, in which case the loan amount could exceed $250,000 in that period. The Company is required to repay all principal and accrued but unpaid interest on amounts advanced pursuant to the Credit Facility no later than August 28, 2009. The initial $500,000 advance under the Credit Facility was made on September 6, 2007. The material terms of the Credit Facility are as follows: (i) the Company has arranged for restricted shares of common stock, held by third parties, to be pledged as collateral for the loans pursuant to a Pledge Agreement between Lender and such third parties; (ii) Lender may reduce the amount of the outstanding loans by retaining for its own account pledged stock, subject to the volume restrictions of Rule 144 (no more than 1% of the outstanding shares for a 90 day period.); (iii) the loans bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum; (iv) on each advance, the Company must repay any accrued but unpaid interest and Lender may withhold two months interest from any advance as prepaid interest; (v) the Company may prepay the principal and interest on the loan without penalty; (vi) Lender may withhold from any advance a retention fee equal to 5% of the amount loaned; (vi) in connection with the issuance of the loan, the Company provided Lender a commitment fee of $50,000 and common stock equal to $250,000 (the shares were valued at the closing price on September 6, 2007, or $2.97 per share, the date on which the first funding in the amount of $500,000 occurred under the Credit Facility. The foregoing equates to 84,746 shares of common stock. The shares of common stock include piggyback registration rights. In consideration for the pledge of a total of 1,842,859 of restricted shares of common stock (“Pledged Shares”), held by third parties, as collateral against the Credit Facility, the Company entered into a Common Stock and Warrant Agreement with each of such third parties providing for the following consideration, collectively: (i) restricted shares of common stock in the amount of 2,763,489 shares (“Pledge Share Consideration”), or 150% of the amount of shares of common stock pledged; and (ii) warrants to purchase 1,842,859 shares of common stock, exercisable for a period of two (2) years at $2.95 per share (“Pledge Warrant Consideration”), the closing price of the Company’s common stock on August 27, 2007. The Common Stock and Warrant Agreements provide that in the event Lender does not reduce the amount of the outstanding loans under the Credit Facility by retaining for its own account Pledged Shares, then the Pledge Share Consideration shall be reduced in proportion to the amount of Pledged Shares not retained for Lender’s account for the purpose of reducing the amount of the outstanding loans under the Credit Facility. In addition, the third parties received one (1) demand registration right. In November 2007, the Company issued the Lender an additional 500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of the Credit Facility. The Company valued the shares of common stock at $935,000 based on the current fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The Company expensed the value of the common stock upon issuance.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, the Company received $1,282,000 in net proceeds pursuant to the Credit Facility, and issued 2,092,860 shares of common stock, collectively, to third parties in consideration for the pledges under the terms of the Credit Facility. In the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company received $416,991 in net proceeds pursuant to the Credit Facility, and issued 669,144 shares of common stock, collectively, to third parties in consideration for the pledges under the terms of the Credit Facility.

15

 
The Company paid Newbridge Securities Corporation the sum of $100,000 and issued 150,000 shares of restricted common stock in consideration for placing the Credit Facility.

Securities Issued under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2007. Information is included for equity compensation plans not approved by our security holders.

Equity Compensation Plan Information.

Plan Category
 
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
 warrants and rights
(a)
 
Weighted-average
exercise price of 
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
 
Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a)
(c)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2)
   
5,821,667
 
$
0.75
   
178,333
 
Total
   
5,821,667
       
178,333
 

(1)  
As of December 31, 2007, the Company did not have any equity compensation plans that were approved by its stockholders.
(2)  
Includes the 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
 
Repurchases of Equity Securities
 
The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during fiscal year 2007 or fiscal year 2006.

Item 6.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.

Certain statements in this Form 10-KSB may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Reform Act"). Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements, expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed herein.  The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "seek" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date the statement was made.
 
16

 
Plan of Operation

NNRF has made investments in, and anticipates making further investments in, strategic businesses that either operate or intend to operate in the nuclear, automotive and aviation industries in Russia. In addition, the Company has, and will continue to, either develop and market, or license and market, internationally, technologies related to the nuclear industry.   NNRF has invested in companies currently operating in the nuclear and automotive industries in Russia and has entered into a joint venture with a Russian company, the Engineering Center for Nuclear Containers, to design and develop containers for transportation and long term storage of high level radioactive waste. Further, the Company presently has technologies that it has either licensed or acquired in the areas of nuclear safety and remediation, wastewater treatment, and power quality. NNRF has, and will continue to, market and either distribute to resellers or sell the products and services related to the foregoing technologies in various international markets. During 2007, NNRF concentrated its international sales and marketing efforts in Europe. NNRF has offices in Moscow, Russia and Munich, Germany.

Our current clients and partners include Rosenergoatom, the operating utility of Russia’s nuclear facilities; Atomstroyexport, established by the Russian government to promote the export of Russian construction, operation and modernization of nuclear power plants abroad; and Stroikomplektinvest, a construction supply distributor acting as NNRF’s marketing partner for power quality equipment in the Republic of Tatarstan.

During 2007 we completed the purchase of 50% of ATOLL, a manufacturer of spare parts for the entire nuclear cycle, including spare parts and mechanisms for nuclear power plants, and handling equipment for nuclear waste containers designed for long term storage of radioactive wastes and spent fuel. We anticipate that our 50% ownership in ATOLL will result in us booking revenues and profits in fiscal year 2008 based on the existing on-hand orders of ATOLL. We completed the due diligence phase of our proposed acquisitions of 25.5% of JSC Electroprivod and 25.5% of Velcont, and are currently considering other potential acquisitions in the RF.

In November 2007 we entered into a 50-50 joint venture with the Moscow based Engineering Center for Nuclear Containers to design and develop containers designed for the transportation and long term storage of high level radioactive waste.

Our scientific group developed our radiation blocking and shielding product line FEECOM/BIECOM and commenced limited commercial production of these products. In addition our group developed a unique flexible version of this product called Bicoflex. This product has specific applications for use in the manufacture of radiation garments and the Company has been in discussions with European manufacturers for the supply of this product. The users of these products are nuclear and medical facilities
 
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this statement. In addition to the historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this statement.

17

 
Results of Operations for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.

Revenues. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, revenues were $NIL as compared to $5,343 at December 31, 2006. Cost of sales was $NIL during the year ended December 31, 2007, and gross profit was $NIL during the period. Cost of sales was $1,615 during the year ended December 31, 2006, and gross profit was $3,728 during the period.

Operating Expenses. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, general and administrative expenses totaled $7,101,548 as compared to $7,153,429 for the period ended December 31, 2006. The general and administrative expenses during 2007 principally related to non-cash items consisting of the issuance of shares of common stock as payment for services of $3,230,225 and stock-based compensation related to the issuance of options of $3,492,566. Foreign currency exchange loss was $NIL during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and $5,558 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $14,706,771 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. Interest expense was $5,072,484 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Significant items included interest expense for 2007 related to various non-cash items, including $4,847,482 in fair value of warrants issued to pledgees in connection with the credit facility provided by Professional Offshore Opportunity Fund, Ltd.; $3,325,299 in the excess of fair value of shares issued to pledgees in connection with the credit facility; and $3,671,644 in amortization of loan debt issuance costs.

Equity Income from ATOLL. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, income recognized from the Company’s investment in ATOLL was $5,662,717 and $39,780, respectively. The increase is related to the increased ownership in ATOLL and an increase in ATOLL’s net income.

Net Loss. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, net loss was $16,145,602 as compared to net loss of $12,187,963 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

The foregoing revenues, operating expenses and net losses are not indicative of what future operating results are anticipated to be. Management for the Company believes that revenues should outpace operating expenses in 2008 and result in net income for fiscal year 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources.

At December 31 2007, our principal source of liquidity consisted of $73,248 of cash, as compared to $130,249 of cash at December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2007, we had working capital deficit of $58,085, as compared to a working capital deficit of $363,880 at December 31, 2006. In addition, our stockholders’ equity was $10,825,407 at December 31, 2007, as compared to $375,590 at December 31, 2006.
 
Our operations used net cash of $2,215,946 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, as compared to $893,863 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
 
Investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 used net cash of $1,523,142, as compared to cash used of $1,161,591 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. The majority of the cash used in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 related to the purchase of 36.75% of ATOLL and 3% of Velcont.
 
18

 
Financing activities provided $3,682,116 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, as compared to $2,162,060 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. The majority of the financing provided during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 related to proceeds from our private placement of 8% convertible promissory notes.
 
We will require additional capital in the future to possibly expand the manufacturing facilities of ATOLL, to make acquisitions, and for general working capital. We anticipate that we will require a minimum of $15,000,000 to fund the JSC Electroprivod and Velcont acquisitions, our investment in our container joint venture, and additional equipment for ATOLL. While we hope to achieve some, or all, of the foregoing through cash flow, there is no assurance that we will be successful in doing so. To the extent we are not, we will require additional capital to achieve our long-term business objectives. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available, or if available, on acceptable terms. If a future financing is procured in the form of equity, the shareholdings of the current stockholders of the Company will be diluted.
 
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
 
Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
In the future, we anticipate deriving the large majority of our revenues from foreign markets, thereby subjecting us to potential foreign currency exposure risks. In addition, given that a significant portion of our current business is located in Russia, we are subject to potential uncertainty when doing business therein, including political, economic and other uncertainties, a major change in any of which could subject us to significant exposure.
 
Going Concern Qualification
 
The Company's independent auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their report on the December 31, 2007 financial statements discussing issues which raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a "going concern."  The going concern qualification is attributable to the Company's historical operating losses, the Company's lack of cash reserves and capital, and the amount of capital which the Company projects it needs to achieve profitable operations.

Risk Factors

The Company is subject to a high degree of risk. The following risks, if any one or more occurs, could materially harm the business, financial condition or future results of operations of the Company. If that occurs, the trading price of the Company’s common stock could decline.
 
The Company has a limited operating history and has experienced operating losses since its inception. 

From inception through December 31, 2007, the Company has incurred a net loss of $28,587,870 and has generated minimal revenues. As a development stage entity, the Company may continue to incur losses until it is able to generate sufficient revenues and cash flows from its various business initiatives outlined herein, including receipt of cash dividends from ATOLL. If the Company is unable to generate sufficient revenues and cash flows to meet its costs of operations, it will be forced to raise additional capital in the form of debt or equity, which may or may not be available, the result of which would dilute the stockholders of the Company, and the Company could be forced to curtail or cease its business operations.

19

 
The Company’s auditors have included a going concern risk in their opinion.

The opinion of the Company’s auditors includes a going concern risk due to the Company being a development stage enterprise that has had nominal sales, has experienced losses from operations and has had negative cash flows from operating activities since inception through the twelve months ended December 31, 2007. Accordingly, in the opinion of the Company’s auditors, the foregoing conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
 
The Company’s capitalization is limited and will require additional funds.

A limiting factor on the growth of the Company, including its ability to penetrate new markets, make acquisitions, attract new customers, and deliver products and services in the areas of nuclear facility construction and periodic replacement of equipment therein, remediation of nuclear and radioactive waste, wastewater treatment, and power quality, among others, is the limited capitalization of the Company compared to other companies in the industry. The Company believes that currently available capital resources will be sufficient to fund the Company for a short period of time, and the Company will require additional funding near-term and in the future to achieve all of its proposed objectives. Any delay in meeting the Company’s anticipated funding requirements will affect its ability to fully implement its business plan, and in the event the Company is unsuccessful in procuring the requisite additional equity or debt financing, the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

A change in the current political landscape or general economic conditions in the Russian Federation could have a major impact on the future success of the Company.

The existing and future strategic and contractual relationships between the Company and governmental agencies in the Russian Federation are significantly dependent on the current political environment remaining status quo. Any change, elected or otherwise, in the political landscape in the Russian Federation could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, the Company's business, earnings, asset values and prospects may be materially and adversely affected by developments with respect to inflation, interest rates, currency fluctuations, price and wage controls, exchange control regulations, taxation, expropriation, social instability, or other economic developments in or affecting the Russian Federation. The Company has no control over such conditions and developments, and can provide no assurance that such conditions and developments will not adversely affect the Company's future operations. 

If the Company fails to establish and maintain key alliances with Russian government agencies responsible for the nuclear waste remediation and power quality industries, among others, or enter into strategic relationships or acquire companies which supply products and services to such agencies, the Company’s growth will be limited.

A key component of the Company’s business plan is (i) establishing and maintaining key alliances with Russian government agencies responsible for the construction and ongoing maintenance of the 31 nuclear reactors in the RF, waste remediation and power quality industries, (ii) entering into strategic relationships and acquiring companies, both Russian and foreign, which supply products and services to the Russian Federation government agencies responsible for the domestic and export nuclear markets, and (iii) identifying, developing and acquiring innovative, proprietary technologies which have environmental and economic applications for the Russian, European and Asian markets. The Company views each of the foregoing as critically important to its near, mid and long-term strategy, however there can be no assurance that the Company will achieve and maintain some, or all, of the foregoing. In the event the Company is unsuccessful, the Company’s overall business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
 
20

 
The Company’s future revenues are difficult to predict given that its various business initiatives are at an early stage.

It is not feasible to predict with assurance the timing or the amount of revenues that the Company will receive from its various business initiatives. Any substantial delay in the introduction of products and services could result in significant delays in revenues and the need to raise additional capital through the issuance of additional equity or debt securities. In view of the emerging nature of certain of the technologies to be offered by the Company, there can be no assurance that the Company will capture market share and that revenues will be significant.


The Company will rely upon various third party manufacturers to produce most of its products and, accordingly, will be subject to risks inherent in outsourcing manufacturing.

Our future success will depend, in large part, on our manufacturers’ ability, including most importantly the Company’s we have invested in, or plan to invest in, our joint venture partners, to meet customers’ expectations with respect to volume, quality, consistency, and performance. Additionally, our manufacturing partners will be required to manufacture new and existing products with design improvements as developed by the Company or third party partners. Further, as we are, and will be, competing in a competitive marketplace comprised of numerous multi-billion dollar entities that manufacture products in-house, we will, from time to time, be subject to potential manufacturing delays and other matters outside of our direct control. Unless we acquire a manufacturing facility for each of our products, we will be reliant upon our manufacturing partners, each of which have other clients for which they manufacture products, to produce high quality products on what we anticipate will be a rapidly increasing production schedule.

The Company will need to sell additional securities to finance future growth, which will dilute our stockholders’ equity interests.
 
Our business strategy includes expansion through internal growth, acquiring complementary technologies and businesses, and the establishment of additional strategic alliances. To accomplish the foregoing, we will issue additional equity securities that will dilute our stockholders' stock ownership. We may also issue, as well as, assume debt and incur impairment losses related to goodwill and other tangible assets if we acquire another company, all of which could negatively impact our results of operations.
 
There exists a risk of environmental liability and we presently lack environmental liability insurance.

The Company's radioactive contaminant technology is subject to numerous federal and local laws and regulations relating to the storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of such materials, and the use of specialized technical equipment in the processing of such materials. There is always the risk that such materials might be mishandled, or that there might be equipment or technology failures, which could result in significant claims for personal injury, property damage, and clean-up or remediation. Any such claims against the Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company does not presently carry any environmental liability insurance, and may be required to obtain such insurance in the future in amounts that are not presently predictable. There can be no assurance that such insurance will provide coverage against all claims, and claims may be made against the Company (even if covered by insurance policies) for amounts substantially in excess of applicable policy limits. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on the Company. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to afford a sufficient level of environmental liability insurance, if it were offered to us.
 
21

 
We may be subject to product liability claims relating to ATOLL in the future, and may not have sufficient product liability insurance to cover any claims, thereby potentially exposing us to substantial liabilities.

As a 50% owner of ATOLL, the Company could become subject to product liability claims from consumers of ATOLL products. The Company’s two executive officers who serve on the board of directors of ATOLL intend to have ATOLL maintain adequate product liability insurance, but product liability insurance alone may not be sufficient to cover any potential product liability claim. Failure to maintain sufficient insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on ATOLL’s business, and consequently the Company’s business, prospects and results of operations if claims are made that exceed the coverage ATOLL has in place or obtains in the future.

Currency rate fluctuations may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We expect to derive most, if not all, of our revenues from operations outside of the U.S. As a result, the majority of our revenues will typically be denominated in non-U.S. currencies, and our operating results may be affected by changes in the relative values of the applicable non-U.S. currencies and the U.S. dollar. We are not utilizing hedging instruments, nor do we anticipate doing so in the future.

We are dependent on our key personnel and will have a need for additional personnel.

The Company’s future performance will be substantially dependent on the continued services and on the performance of our management. In particular, Peter Goerke, Executive Vice President and Secretary, J.P. Todd Sinclair, Chief Financial Officer, Dr. Valery Lebedev, Chief Scientific Officer, and Dr. Hans-Jürgen Engelmann, Director of Project and Sales Division, Shielding and Encapsulation EU. The Company’s performance also depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate additional key employees. The loss of the services of Messrs. Goerke, Sinclair, Lebedev, or Engelmann, or any other key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. We do not currently carry key man insurance on any of the foregoing parties. We anticipate doing so in the future with respect to certain members of management.

The acquisition of 50% of ATOLL along with the various strategic partnerships and other business initiatives are anticipated to result in an increase in the demands on our management and our operating systems and internal controls.

Messrs. Goerke and Sinclair are members of the board of directors of ATOLL and spend a measurable amount of time on ATOLL matters. The Company’s anticipated future growth will likely strain existing management resources and operational, financial, human and management information systems and controls, which may not be adequate to support our operations and will require us to develop further financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop such controls, systems or procedures effectively, or on a timely basis. Our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

22

 
We have issued stock options to all of our directors, officers, key employees and certain consultants, pursuant to our 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, which will have a dilutive effect on our book value.

We have implemented our 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan to provide a mechanism for issuance of stock options and restricted stock to our officers, directors, key employees and consultants. As of December 31, 2007, we have issued and outstanding options to purchase 5,821,667 shares of common stock. Because stock options granted under the Plan will generally only be exercised when the exercise price for such option is below the then market value of our common stock, the exercise of stock options will cause dilution to the book value per share of our common stock. The grant of restricted stock awards will have a similar dilutive effect on our book value. The 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan must still be approved by a majority of the stockholders of the Company at the next annual stockholders meeting.
 
If we are unable to protect our proprietary information against unauthorized use by others, our competitive position could be harmed.

Our proprietary information is critically important to our competitive position and is a significant aspect of the products we provide. If we are unable to protect our proprietary information against unauthorized use by others, our competitive position could be harmed. We generally enter into confidentiality and non-compete agreements with our employees and consultants, and control access to, and distribution of, our documentation and other proprietary information. Despite these precautions, we cannot assure you that these strategies will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our proprietary information. Therefore, we could be required to expend significant amounts to defend our rights to proprietary information in the future if a breach were to occur. No assurance can be given that we will have the financial ability to defend and/or protect our proprietary rights.

There is a limited market for the securities of the Company at this time. 

Our common stock currently trades on the Pink Sheets and there is a limited market. In addition, our common stock is considered a "penny stock" which subjects our shares to rules affecting their ability to be sold.  Under the penny stock regulations, a broker-dealer selling penny stocks to anyone other than an established customer or “accredited investor" (generally, an individual with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with his or her spouse) must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and must receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the sale, unless the broker-dealer is otherwise exempt. In addition, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt, the penny stock regulations require the broker-dealer to (i) deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule relating to the penny stock, (ii) to disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities, (iii) send monthly statements disclosing recent price information with respect to the penny stock held in a customer's account and information with respect to the limited market in penny stocks.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In future periods, we will be required to evaluate our internal controls under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), and any adverse results from such evaluation could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and have an adverse effect on the price of our shares of common stock. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, we were not required to assess our system of internal controls. Pursuant to Section 404 of SOX, in the near future, smaller reporting companies, such as NNRF, Inc. will be required to furnish a report by management on our internal controls over financial reporting.  This report will contain among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, including a statement as to whether or not our internal control over financial reporting is effective.  This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting identified by our management.  This report must also contain a statement that our auditors have issued an attestation report on our management’s assessment of these internal controls.  Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 2 provides the professional standards for auditors to attest to, and report on, our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404.

23

 
We cannot be certain that we will be able to complete our assessment, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion.  During the evaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that such internal control is effective.  If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective (or if our auditors are unable to attest that our management’s report is fairly stated or they are unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls), we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

Failure to comply with the new rules may make it more difficult for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance.  We may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage and/or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage.  The impact of these events could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, on committees of our board of directors, or as executive officers.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. 

Our current plan is to reinvest all future earnings, if applicable, for working capital, future acquisitions, marketing and capital expenditures. Therefore, stockholders in the Company should not expect to receive dividends on their shares of common stock.

The Company’s articles of incorporation, bylaws and state law contain provisions that preserve current management.

Provisions of state law, the Company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a change in the Company’s management team that stockholders may consider favorable. These provisions include: authorizing the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock without any need for action by stockholders; permitting stockholder action by written consent; and establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings. These provisions could allow the Company’s board of directors to affect the investor’s rights as a stockholder since the board of directors can make it more difficult for preferred stockholders, if applicable, or common stockholders to replace members of the board of directors. Because the board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of the management team, these provisions could in turn affect any attempt to replace the current or future management team.

24

 
Item 7. Financial Statements.

NNRF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A Development Stage Company)

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   
Page
     
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  F-2
     
Consolidated Balance Sheets
  F-3
     
Consolidated Statements of Operations
  F-4
     
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
  F-5
     
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
  F-6
     
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
  F-7
 
F-1

 
HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.
A Professional Corporation
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
5 Triad Center, Suite 750
Salt Lake City, UT 84180-1128
Phone: (801) 532-2200
Fax: (801) 532-7944
www.hbmcpas.com
 
Registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board
 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and the Stockholders
NNRF, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NNRF, Inc. and subsidiaries (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from August 25, 2005 (date of inception) through December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company was not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NNRF, Inc. and subsidiaries (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from August 25, 2005 (date of inception) through December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2, the Company is a development stage enterprise that has had no sales from its planned operations, has experienced losses from operations and has had negative cash flows from operating activities since inception. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.                          
Salt Lake City, Utah
April 14, 2008 

F-2


 
NNRF, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
   
2007
 
2006 
 
       
As Restated
 
ASSETS
             
Current Assets
             
Cash
 
$
73,248
 
$
130,249
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
276,059
   
6,249
 
Total Current Assets
   
349,307
   
136,498
 
Furniture and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $4,015 and $3,415 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively
   
6,329
   
9,442
 
Deferred loan costs, net of accumulated amortization of $66,579 at December 31, 2006
   
-
   
307,881
 
Equity method investment in ATOLL
   
10,352,228
   
1,206,030
 
Investments, at cost
   
525,655
   
-
 
Total Assets
 
$
11,233,519
 
$
1,659,851
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
             
Current Liabilities
             
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
$
136,413
 
$
133,128
 
Management fee payable
   
230,816
   
271,625
 
Accrued interest
   
1,842
   
56,584
 
Shareholder advances
   
39,041
   
39,041
 
Total Current Liabilities
   
408,112
   
500,378
 
               
Long-Term Convertible Notes Payable, net of unamortized discount of $1,165,617 at December 31, 2006
   
-
   
783,883
 
Total Liabilities
   
408,112
   
1,284,261
 
Stockholders' Equity
             
Class A Preferred Stock - $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding
   
-
   
-
 
Class B Preferred Stock - $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding
   
-
   
-
 
Common stock - $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 47,008,810 shares and 33,529,406, shares issued and outstanding, respectively
   
47,009
   
33,529
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
39,052,399
   
12,787,497
 
Deficit accumulated during the development stage
   
(28,587,870
)
 
(12,442,268
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
   
313,869
 
 
(3,168
)
Total Stockholders' Equity
   
10,825,407
   
375,590
 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
 
$
11,233,519
 
$
1,659,851
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
 
F-3

 
NNRF, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

       
For the Period from
 
       
August 25, 2005
 
   
For the Year Ended
 
(Date of Inception)
 
   
December 31,
 
through
 
   
2007
 
2006
 
December 31, 2007
 
       
As Restated
     
Sales
 
$
-
 
$
5,343
 
$
5,343
 
Cost of Sales
   
-
   
1,615
   
1,615
 
Gross Profit
   
-
   
3,728
   
3,728
 
Operating Expenses
                   
General and administrative expenses
   
7,101,548
   
7,153,429
   
14,508,995
 
Foreign currency exchange loss
   
-
   
5,558
   
5,845
 
Total Operating Expenses
   
7,101,548
   
7,158,987
   
14,514,840
 
Operating Loss
   
(7,101,548
)
 
(7,155,259
)
 
(14,511,112
)
Interest expense
   
(14,706,771
)
 
(5,072,484
)
 
(19,779,255
)
Equity in income from ATOLL
   
5,662,717
   
39,780
   
5,702,497
 
Net Loss
 
$
(16,145,602
)
$
(12,187,963
)
$
(28,587,870
)
Basic and Diluted Loss per Share
 
$
(0.39
)
$
(0.44
)
     
Basic and Diluted Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding
   
40,954,215
   
27,693,415
       

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
 
F-4

 
NNRF, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the period from April 25, 2005 (Date of Inception) through December 31, 2005 and for the Years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007
 
 
         
Deficit
         
       
Additional
 
Accumulated
 
Accumulated
 
Total
 
       
Paid-in
 
During the
 
Other
 
Stockholders'
 
   
Common Stock
 
Capital
 
Development
 
Comprehensive
 
Equity
 
   
Shares  
 
Amount
 
(Deficit)
 
Stage
 
Loss
 
(Deficit)
 
August 25, 2005 (Date of Inception)
   
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
Issuance of common stock for cash:
                                     
August 2005 - $0.0002 per share
   
22,500,000
   
22,500
   
(17,500
)
 
-
   
-
   
5,000
 
Net loss
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(254,305
)
 
-
   
(254,305
)
Balance - December 31, 2005
   
22,500,000
   
22,500
   
(17,500
)
 
(254,305
)
 
-
   
(249,305
)
Net loss (Restated)
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(12,187,963
)
 
-
   
(12,187,963
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(3,168
)
 
(3,168
)
Comprehensive Loss
                                 
(12,191,131
)
Acquisition of Stafford - May 2006
   
359,500
   
359
   
(136,542
)
 
-
   
-
   
(136,183
)
Issuance of common stock for cash:
                                     
July 2006 - $0.75 per share
   
185,000
   
185
   
138,565
   
-
   
-
   
138,750
 
October 2006 - $0.75 per share
   
128,500
   
129
   
95,996
   
-
   
-
   
96,125
 
December 2006 - $0.75 per share
   
101,333
   
101
   
75,899
   
-
   
-
   
76,000
 
Issuance of commons stock for conversion of liabilities:
                                     
May 2006 - $1.05 per share
   
2,857
   
3
   
2,997
   
-
   
-
   
3,000
 
July 2006 - $1.10 per share
   
311,025
   
311
   
341,817
   
-
   
-
   
342,128
 
December 2006 - $0.75 per share
   
432,000
   
432
   
323,568
   
-
   
-
   
324,000
 
                                       
Issuance of common stock for payment of interest:
                                     
July 2006 - $1.10 per share
   
4,282,048
   
4,282
   
4,705,970
   
-
   
-
   
4,710,252
 
Issuance of common stock for services:
                                     
May 2006 - $1.05 per share
   
2,997,143
   
2,997
   
3,144,003
   
-
   
-
   
3,147,000
 
July 2006 - $1.40 per share
   
1,080,000
   
1,080
   
1,510,920
   
-
   
-
   
1,512,000
 
September 2006 - $1.39 per share
   
400,000
   
400
   
555,600
   
-
   
-
   
556,000
 
December 2006 - $0.75 per share
   
750,000
   
750
   
561,750